<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JoshLowe.com &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshlowe.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshlowe.com</link>
	<description>Are you sure you wanted to come here?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are pain-free animals ok to eat?</title>
		<link>http://joshlowe.com/2009/09/08/are-pain-free-animals-ok-to-eat/</link>
		<comments>http://joshlowe.com/2009/09/08/are-pain-free-animals-ok-to-eat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vegetarian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshlowe.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw an interesting story in New Scientist today.  Evidently, scientists may have determined a way to genetically alter animals to no longer experience pain.  The question raised in the article is what implications this may have on livestock animals.
The argument is made that if cattle, for example, are no longer able to feel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw an <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327243.400-painfree-animals-could-take-suffering-out-of-farming.html?full=true">interesting story</a> in <i>New Scientist</i> today.  Evidently, scientists may have determined a way to genetically alter animals to no longer experience pain.  The question raised in the article is what implications this may have on livestock animals.</p>
<p>The argument is made that if cattle, for example, are no longer able to feel pain, perhaps there will be less ethical delimas related to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factory_farming">factory-farming</a> practices. (Think your meat purchases come from smaller farmers? &#8220;In the U.S., four companies produce 81 percent of cows, 73 percent of sheep, 57 percent of pigs and 50 percent of chickens.&#8221;)  I would argue that even though one could eliminate the ability for an animal to feel pain, it does not mean that the animal should be treated in an inhumane way.  This solution also does not address the significant impact factory farming has on the environment.</p>
<p><span id="more-119"></span></p>
<p>For some reason, we people tend to ignore pain and suffering by any organism that cannot speak for itself.  Abortions are conducted where the only voice acknowledged is the voice of the mother; yet we know that a fetus can feel pain at least by <a href="http://www.gargaro.com/fetalpain.html">20 weeks</a>.  Even if you don&#8217;t buy the abortion argument, circumcision is something performed on infant males widely throughout the United States. However, rarely is any pain management used with infants due to the concerns this may have on development.  Yet the idea of an adult male being circumcised without managing the pain seems torturous.  Tests have been conducted to <a href="http://www.circumcision.org/response.htm">objectively measure</a> a baby&#8217;s response to circumcision verses other early medical procedures.  These tests indicate that infants do indeed feel a significant level of pain during this procedure. We debeak chickens and we cut the tails off of dogs, sheep, and other animals.  We declaw cats.  I&#8217;m sure there are other examples.  Yet, we only perform these actions on animals/infants that cannot speak to the pain they are in.</p>
<p>Perhaps I am going off on a tangent.  And, true, one could argue that genetically altering the livestock to feel less pain would take away some of the complaints.  However, one must also consider the drawbacks.  First, and foremost, how will not feeling pain affect an animal&#8217;s natural ability to learn from and avoid dangerous situations? Will there be pigs chewing their own legs out of boredom and no pain signals to tell them to stop? Will cows run through barbed wire without concern for being cut? There is actually a precedent.  A family had <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16185231/ns/health-more_health_news/">six children</a> who could not feel pain.  A blessing in disguise? Not so.  When the story was run, they had multiple injuries and one had accidentally killed himself by jumping from a roof.  A real question that must be considered is, &#8220;what are the ramifications from such a genetic mutation?&#8221; Also, &#8220;what effect will this have on the human consumers of this mutated meat?&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps this idea of removing pain from animals will be a non-starter.  I hope so.  But it completely falls in line with other solutions the agricultural industry has created to address problems with factory-farming:</p>
<ul>
<li><b>Problem:</b> Consumption of meat has increased dramatically with less available land and people raising animals.</li>
<li><b>Solution:</b> Crowd animals into small cages and process and butcher them as quickly as possible.</li>
<li><b>Problem:</b> Due to crowding, chickens are more aggressive and cannibalistic.</li>
<li><b>Solution:</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debeaking#Pros_and_cons_of_beak_trimming">Debeak</a> the chickens to reduce mortality and damage to other birds.</li>
<li><b>Problem:</b> Piglets suck milk from the mother far too long before fattening them up for slaughter, affecting bottom line.</li>
<li><b>Solution:</b> Remove piglets from mother sooner and begin feeding solid food to increase growth.</li>
<li><b>Problem:</b> Pigs suck and chew on tails of other pigs because they were removed from sucking on the mother too soon.</li>
<li><b>Solution</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docking_(animal)">Dock the tails</a> of the pigs to keep them from chewing on each other.</li>
<li><b>Problem:</b> Animals are becoming sick due to the overcrowding.</li>
<li><b>Solution:</b> Pump them full of antibiotics.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, the <i>new</i> problem and solution: Animals are experiencing discomfort and pain due to overcrowding, lack of effective care, and lack of supervision of slaughtering procedures.  Solution? Genetically alter them to not experience pain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshlowe.com/2009/09/08/are-pain-free-animals-ok-to-eat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Who?</title>
		<link>http://joshlowe.com/2008/09/05/sarah-who/</link>
		<comments>http://joshlowe.com/2008/09/05/sarah-who/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshlowe.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone not been completely shocked by the way the presidential race has been changed now that Sarah Palin is on the Republican ticket?
It amazes me.  Now, I consider myself Libertarian, but McCain is moderate enough to get my vote (that and I truly believe if Obama is elected, extreme left policies will be put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone <em>not</em> been completely shocked by the way the presidential race has been changed now that Sarah Palin is on the Republican ticket?</p>
<p>It amazes me.  Now, I consider myself Libertarian, but McCain is moderate enough to get my vote (that and I truly believe if Obama is elected, extreme left policies will be put in place and he has no idea how to lead).  Palin is far from moderate.  On most social issues, I agree with Democrats and on most Goverment issues I agree with Republicans.  So, Palin&#8217;s very very conservative social stance does not agree with my personal politics, but you can&#8217;t help (no matter who you support) but be impressed with her.</p>
<p>Did you know that almost 39 MILLION people tuned in to watch McCain&#8217;s nomination speech? That&#8217;s 500k more than Obama&#8217;s record-breaking numbers.  But I certainly attribute it to Sarah Palin.  Over 37 million tuned in for her speech! (Compared to Biden&#8217;s 24 million.) And she certainly delivered.  The press had been dogging her for days and I was shocked and upset at how unfairly she was being treated.  Questions were asked of her that shouldn&#8217;t be asked.  And questions were asked that SHOULD be asked of Obama but haven&#8217;t been pushed.  Well, the plan backfired &#8212; she delivered an amazing speech.  If you didn&#8217;t see it, go watch it on youtube.</p>
<p>So, with Palin uniting the conservative base, that left McCain to give his nomination speech on what I was hoping to hear: letting people know he has a record of working across the aisle; avoiding strong attacks on Obama; and presenting a message of hope for our country.  It was the right speech, at the right time (39 million reasons why).  So, it&#8217;s a new campaign&#8230; I&#8217;m very excited.</p>
<p>The press continues to dig and dig and try to find something on Palin, but, so far, they have little to show for their work.  You can tell that democrats and the media that support them are truly scared of Palin.  I believe this may be the spark to put this election away.  But if you watch CNN, you can see the attacks developing and then moving on as they never get any ground&#8230; it&#8217;s great! (I would watch MSNBC for the attacks, but I just can&#8217;t stomach it.)</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example: Palin said in her speech that the governors office owned a jet, and that was wasteful.  So she says she put it on ebay.  Well, CNN is saying that she is deceptive because it didn&#8217;t sell on ebay.  It was sold later by private auction.  So&#8230;. she DID list it on ebay (which is what she said), and it DID sell (but other auction), right? Wow&#8230; she is soo misleading.  Good thing we have the investigative team of reporters to check into such lies.</p>
<p>So, yeah.  I&#8217;m hoping 60 days from now, McCain/Palin will win the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshlowe.com/2008/09/05/sarah-who/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
